Thursday, August 21, 2014

SEC: Mo's 2014 Prediction

It's going to be a fun season to watch the SEC.  I don't believe top-to-bottom the SEC has been far and away the best conference in America for years and years like ESPN has been touting for 8 years now.  Their champion has been the best team in America over that time period.  But until this year, I haven't seen the middle of the SEC as strong as they like to think it is.  There really are 10 solid teams this year.  I think the 8th best team in the SEC could compete for a conference title in every other league in America.  I don't think they'd win it, but they'd compete.

Here is how my model rates the SEC teams, followed by conference standings.

Auburn 1
South Carolina 6
Alabama 8
Georgia 12
Ole Miss 13
LSU 17
Missouri 21
Texas A&M 24
Mississippi St 26
Florida 36
Arkansas 52
Vanderbilt 57
Kentucky 79
Tennessee 83

West
Auburn 7-1
LSU 6-2
Ole Miss 6-2
Alabama 6-2
Mississippi State 4-4
Texas A&M 3-5
Arkansas 0-8
East
South Carolina 7-1
Missouri 6-2
Georgia 5-3
Florida 3-5
Vanderbilt 2-6
Tennessee 1-7
Kentucky 0-8

Auburn beats South Carolina for the SEC Title.  It'll be interesting to see how the College Football Playoff Selection Committee treats a 1-loss SEC champion.  It seems almost a certainty that the SEC champ will have one loss.  South Carolina has the best chance to go undefeated, but would have to win a game at Auburn to do it.  Auburn plays 5 games that my model says will be decided by a touchdown or less.  South Carolina only plays 2 such games (but one of them is at Auburn).  I guess you could say my model doesn't like either of their chances to go undefeated.

Pac 12: Mo's 2014 Prediction

My model places the Pac 12 as the #2 conference in America behind the SEC.  How tough will the Pac 12 be this season?  My model has Stanford as the #5 team in America and my model predicts them to go 5-4 in Pac 12 play.  If Colorado or California can find a way to win 4-6 of their combined non-conference games, or steal a couple in conference play, according to my model, the Pac 12 would jump the SEC as the best conference in America.

Oregon 3
UCLA 4
Stanford 5
Arizona St 9
Washington 15
USC 16
Oregon St 30
Utah 51
Washington St 56
Arizona 61
Colorado 87
California 90

North
Oregon 8-1
Washington 7-2
Stanford 5-4
Oregon State 4-5
Washington State 2-7
California 1-8
South
UCLA 8-1
USC 7-2
Arizona State 7-2
Utah 3-6
Arizona 2-7
Colorado 0-9

I do not believe Colorado will go winless.  I do not see Utah getting all of the 3 Pac 12 wins my model predicts (though I think 3 is a good number, one upset and two of the three they "should" win).  Stanford plays at Washington, at Arizona State, at Oregon, and at UCLA.  They'll probably pull off one of those 4, but my model predicts 4 losses there, all by less than a TD.  UCLA hosts Oregon in the Pac 12 Title game (a rematch of an earlier game won by UCLA): UCLA wins and heads on to represent the Pac 12 in the Inaugural College Football Playoff as a 2/3 seed, my guess is against the SEC champion.  I've got to think Florida State runs the table and gets the #1 seed, in spite of a much easier schedule than every one else in the playoff.  The SEC champ, whether that's Auburn, Georgia, Ole Miss, Alabama, LSU, South Carolina, or Missouri, isn't going to go 13-0.

MWC: Mo's 2014 Prediction

The MWC sure has gone downhill lately.  There is talk of Hawaii dissolving football altogether.  After turning down multiple suitors for the last 5 years, Chris Peterson finally left Boise State: did he see the writing on the wall?  Boise was trending slowly downward and the MWC was doing so more quickly.  My model has them sliding below CUSA as the 8th best conference (or 3rd worst), with half the conference settling in the bottom 30 of all college football teams.  Still, there is always some intrigue in the MWC with the triumvirate of Fresno State, Boise State, and Utah State.  My model predicts the winner of the final regular season game between Utah State and Boise State to win the Mountain Division.  The home field advantage gives Boise the close win.  Fresno State, by virtue of higher BCS ranking, hosts the championship game where the home field gives them a win and a berth in the Vegas Bowl.

Fresno St 39
Boise St 47
Utah St 55
San Diego St 72
Nevada 74
UNLV 88
Wyoming 102
Colorado St 104
New Mexico 107
San Jose St 108
Air Force 116
Hawaii 122

West
Fresno State 7-1
Nevada 6-2
SDSU 5-3
UNLV 4-4
SJSU 2-6
Hawaii 0-8
Mountain
Boise State 8-0
Utah State 7-1
Colorado State 4-4
Wyoming 3-5
Air Force 1-7
New Mexico 1-7

CUSA and MAC: Mo's 2014 Predictions

Conference USA:

UTSA 23
Marshall 31
ODU 42
Rice 69
North Texas 84
MTSU 85
WKU 94
Louisiana Tech 96
FIU 109
UTEP 111
UAB 118
FAU 119
So Miss 121

CUSA
East
Marshall 8-0
ODU 7-1
MTSU 6-2
WKU 3-5
UAB 1-7
FIU 1-7
FAU 1-7
West
UTSA 8-0
North Texas 6-2
Rice 5-3
Louisiana Tech 4-4
UTEP 1-7
Southern Miss 1-7

UTSA over Marshall in title game.  UTSA looks like a legitimately good team this season.  On paper they might have what it takes to go 12-0, even with games at Houston and OK State in addition to hosting Arizona.  Model has them 11-1.  Old Dominion also looks strong on paper.  Those two teams are both somewhat new to FBS level, so perhaps it is only on paper that they look so good...

MAC:

NIU 27
Toledo 58
Buffalo 66
CMU 68
Bowling Green 76
Ball St 91
Akron 95
Ohio 103
EMU 114
Kent St 120
Miami (OH) 123
Massachusetts 126
WMU 127

MAC
East
Bowling Green 7-1
Buffalo 7-1
Ohio 4-4
Akron 4-4
Miami (OH) 3-5
Kent State 1-7
Massachusetts 0-8
West
NIU 8-0
Toledo 7-1
CMU 5-3
Ball State 4-4
EMU 2-6
WMU 0-8

NIU looks like the team to beat again.  This is a very bottom heavy conference, so most of the half-decent teams end up with 7+ wins in an 8-game conference schedule.  I look for Ohio to rebuild a little this season, come on strong at the end and spring themselves into a successful 2015 season.  You heard it hear first, Bobcat fans, make your 2015 MAC Championship plans now!

Big XII: Mo's 2014 Predictions

For the 2nd straight year, my model predicts a straight line down the Big 12 Standings.  OU goes 9-0, Iowa State 0-9, with someone occupying every spot in between.  The Big 12 is rated as the 3rd best conference, with #3-8 in the conference really only separated by home field advantage.

Oklahoma 7
Texas 10
Baylor 32
TCU 45
Kansas St 46
OK State 54
Texas Tech 65
West Virginia 67
Iowa St 80
Kansas 89

Oklahoma 9-0
Texas 8-1
Baylor 7-2
TCU 6-3
Kansas State 5-4
OK State 4-5
Texas Tech 3-6
WVU 2-7
Kansas 1-8
Iowa State 0-9

I don't really like the symmetry of this, especially with so many close games being predicted.  Every team seems to play at home against the team just worse than them and on the road against the team just better than them, which is what causes the symmetry.  Iowa State is predicted to have 3 losses by less than 3 points and another one less than a TD.  I'd be shocked to see them 0-9, especially with Kansas and West Virginia...

ACC: Mo's 2014 Predictions

I'm starting to run out of time to give a brief run-down on every team, so I'll just post the ratings and conference record of every team, as based on my model, starting with the ACC.

Florida State 2
Louisville 22
Miami 28
Duke 38
Clemson 40
Virginia Tech 43
Syracuse 50
North Carolina 63
Georgia Tech 70
Boston College 71
NC State 73
Pittsburgh 75
Virginia 86
Wake Forest 115

Atlantic
Florida State 8-0
Louisville 7-1
Clemson 6-2
Syracuse 4-4
NC State 3-5
Boston College 2-6
Wake Forest 0-8
Coastal
Duke 7-1
Miami 6-2
Virginia Tech 6-2
North Carolina 4-4
Pitt 2-6
Georgia Tech 1-7
Virginia 0-8

I don't agree with the Georgia Tech record necessarily.  It figures to be somewhat of a rebuilding season and they have 3 games on the road against ACC teams they would beat on a neutral field.  My model has those as close games, but all losses.  In reality, I think they'll pull off one or two of those along with another "upset" but some teams never figure out how to win on the road: if that is GT's lot this season then it could be a long one.  Duke isn't the best team in the ACC Coastal, but they have the most favorable schedule: they avoid Florida State, Louisville, and Clemson from the Atlantic Division and get Virginia Tech at home.  If Louisville can start the season off with a win against Miami, I like that 7-1 conference record as they play 4 straight easy games after that and can gain confidence for a young QB and young defense.  If they lose that, then I'd flip them with Clemson.

On a side note, Notre Dame goes 3-1 against the ACC, losing at Florida State while pulling off wins at home against North Carolina and Louisville while beating Syracuse on a neutral field.

Big Ten Conference: Mo's 2014 Predictions

Breaking the alphabetical trend, I thought I’d jump to the Big Ten (or Fourteen) next.  With a season-ending injury to Ohio State’s Braxton Miller, I thought I’d take a look at Ohio State and the rest of the Big Ten with him done-zo.  First off, I don’t typically update my model to reflect injuries: too many teams and injuries to figure out the impact of every single one.  Secondly, one look at Ohio State’s team vs. their schedule and he might be the difference in maybe one game in the regular season, two at the most.  Their schedule is that easy.
 
As much as I hate to admit it Ohio State, with Braxton Miller, is a top 5 type of team.  Without him, they are almost certainly still a top 25 type of team, if not higher than that.  They are still coached by the (biggest jerk who happens to also be the) second-best college football coach in America.  They still manage to pull in top recruits, year after year.  They are the best team in the Big Ten with Braxton Miller, they are probably still the 2nd best team without him, at worst the 3rd.  Even if they fell to 3rd, they only play one of the other two: a game at Michigan State that my model had them losing even with Miller.  Their non-conference schedule should be a cake walk for an Urban Meyer-coached squad and the conference slate has them avoiding anyone of consequence from the other division.
 
Because it is a legitimate Heisman candidate, 3-year starting QB, and because it is Ohio State and Urban Meyer (and I love having any good reason to downgrade them), I will remove his aura from the model.  I will tell you, however, my model had Ohio State at 11-1 before the injury and the model still projects 11 wins for Ohio State.  Like I said, the schedule was that easy.  It moves the comfortable wins into tighter affairs and a couple of what should have been good wins are a lot closer to toss-up territory as a result.  There are 2 other potential tweaks I will make to my model before the season starts, but for now, here are the "rankings" of Big Ten teams relative to all of CFB.
 
Michigan St11
Wisconsin20
Ohio St25
Iowa34
Indiana35
Michigan37
Minnesota41
Nebraska49
Maryland59
Rutgers60
Northwestern62
Penn St64
Illinois78
Purdue93
 
Ohio State was #5 prior to the injury.  Michigan State is no surprise near the top 10.  Wisconsin should have another solid team.  Iowa, Indiana, and Minnesota surprised me being rated as high as they are, but they are pretty seasoned teams that took some lumps playing younger players and this is the payoff season.
 
All in all, I think this will be one of the more balanced years we see throughout the Big Ten.  I suppose that happens when the top is a little bit weaker than it traditionally is.  Purdue and Illinois are really the only freebies, regardless of venue.  Penn State, NW, Rutgers, Maryland will all be tough on the road.
 
The standings have changed with the additions of Rutgers and Maryland, so here is a quick recap of where everyone lines up this season:
East: Indiana, Maryland, Michigan State, Michigan, Ohio State, Penn State, Rutgers
West: Illinois, Iowa, Nebraska, Northwestern, Minnesota, Purdue, Wisconsin
 
East (in order of projected finish)
Michigan State is stacked.  They have an early season test on the road against Oregon, which will really test their young defense.  After that, however, I suspect that Sparty wins every game by double digits.  For as balanced as the conference is, the cream should rise to the top.
 
Ohio State will probably go 10-2 or better and Urban Meyer's amazing job recovering from the loss of Braxton Miller will be one of the storylines of the year.  I think that storyline is awful, but ESPN will pound that into our heads all season long.  The fact is the Big Ten isn't that difficult, Ohio State has a decent team, and there are 20-30 teams that could navigate the Buckeyes schedule 10-2/11-1.
 
Michigan hasn't been able to quite get over the hump under Brady Hoke.  They may have some issues on the offensive line this season, particularly against Notre Dame, Michigan State, and Ohio State (model has 3 losses), but the rest of the schedule is manageable, a theme with the bigger Big Ten schools over the better part of the last 50 years.  The model projects lots of close games for Michigan, so there is a chance to be upper echelon or a possibility of dropping to barely bowl eligible.
 
Indiana has an unfortunate schedule this season.  They're going to lose to Michigan State regardless, but potentially winnable (for Indiana) games for them are mostly on the road: Iowa and Michigan.  I think that makes it a season where the Hoosiers should make a bowl game, but the chance for one of those once in a blue moon seasons for them is slim.  They have a lot coming back from a team that managed a 5-7 year.  That is not a bad season in Indiana, actually.  They don't have a storied history, but the future, at least for this year, looks good.
 
Penn State's bowl game is in Ireland the first week of the season.  They aren't eligible for any real postseason play, so I admire the choice to get a game like this against UCF.
 
I don't expect Maryland to win many games after September.  They have been trending in the right direction the past two seasons but I don't think they have the size upfront to sustain anything in their first time through the Big Ten.
 
Rutgers is coming into the Big Ten at as good a time as they could have in terms of their team.  They are experienced and will only add more talent as their profile increases.  The Scarlet Knights play one of the top 25 toughest schedules in the country and the toughest one in the Big Ten.  They play multiple non-conference road games (a rarity for a Big Ten team: I guess they didn't get the memo) and their Big Ten crossover games are at Nebraska and at home against Wisconsin.  My model puts them short of bowl eligibility b/c of the difficult schedule.
 
West (in order of projected finish)
Wisconsin figures to be a really good team this season.  Outside of a neutral site game against a good, but beatable LSU team, the only challenge will be on the road at Iowa the 2nd to last game of the season.  My model projects the winner of that game to win the division.
 
Iowa was the biggest surprise to me in my entire model.  I had not anticipated a possible 10-win season from them but combination of a favorable schedule and a top 35 rankings puts that in reach.  Every now and again they put together a great campaign and this looks like the season.  Their crossover games are Indiana and Maryland (both projected wins).  Their toughest in-division games are at Minnesota and the aforementioned home game against Wisconsin.
 
Nebraska has to travel to Fresno State, Michigan State, Wisconsin, and Iowa.  I guess they didn't get the memo about Big Ten scheduling either.  It was bound to be somewhat of a rebuilding year anyway, but that schedule won't help appease the fan base that is already itching for a return to their former glory.  They also play at Northwestern and the home game against Minnesota is no gimme either (especially if the Huskers already have 3 or 4 losses).  Nebraska takes a step back in 2014.
 
Minnesota has as brutal a 4-game stretch as anyone in the Big Ten.  They play Iowa and Ohio State at home before traveling to Nebraska and Wisconsin.  They also play at TCU and Michigan.  If they can pull off a 3-3 record in those games (certainly possible: my model has 4 of those 6 games playing out within a FG), I think we're looking at a top 25 type of team here.
 
When the schedule and the team align, Northwestern can do good things.  I think the team has some experience and is capable of a few upsets.  However, it'll be somewhat of an uphill battle to get to a bowl game this season b/c the schedule doesn't quite align.  A couple of their "toss-up" games come on the road: they are losing to Wisconsin and Notre Dame regardless of venue.
 
Illinois has an experienced team but it's not a very good one.  I think the best Illini fans could hope for is 2 wins in conference play, though my model projects just 1 (Purdue).
 
Purdue seems to be in constant rebuilding mode.  My model projects a non-conference loss to CMU and a winless Big Ten campaign.  I'd be shocked if they didn't pull off a 3rd win somewhere b/c I think their DL is actually pretty strong, but the model caps them at 2.
 
So the model predicts a Wisconsin-Michigan State Big Ten Title game, a not out-of-reach top 10 ranking for Ohio State, and a surprising Iowa team almost certainly bound for the top 20.  As of now, Michigan State would be 4-point favorites over Wisconsin in that title matchup.

Saturday, August 16, 2014

American Athletic Conference 2014 Predictions

Let's dive right into predictions with the first conference alphabetically, the AAC.  The headline for this group coming into this season was how the conference, as a whole, would respond after UCF's great BCS Bowl game performance last season.  UCF figures to rebuild somewhat this season (at least offensively), Houston is young but very dangerous, ECU and Cincinnati are both not too far behind those two and may even finish ahead of one or both in the final standings.

My rating system has the AAC, not surprisingly, as the 6th best conference.  The average rating of AAC teams is 76.82 with Houston leading the charge, coming in as the 33rd best team in the country.  The conference is weighed down by several sub-100 teams: SMU and Temple.  Here are the ratings based on my model:
Houston 33
UCF 44
ECU 48
Cincinnati 53
Tulane 77
USF 81
Connecticut 82
Tulsa 98
Memphis 99
SMU 106
Temple 124

In addition to being the highest rated team, Houston also has a favorable conference schedule.  They host #2 UCF, they avoid #3 ECU, and don't play Cincinnati until the final week of the season when they may already have the conference title wrapped up.  Houston, to me, is a very dangerous team regardless of schedule.  They took a few lumps with a true freshman at QB last season, but still finished a very respectable 8-5.  They return 17 starters from that team.  They are still quite young but not inexperienced.  They have one of the top WRs in the country, in my opinion, in Deontay Greenberry and have a solid complement to him in the smaller, shiftier Daniel Spencer.  They also return their entire rushing attack and a good portion of the OL.  They have a reasonably difficult non-conference schedule, hosting UTSA (who is one of my sleeper picks this season), traveling to BYU, and hosting UNLV who is coming off their first bowl appearance in 13 years last season.  My model calls for an undefeated run through conference play for them, with possibilities against UTSA and at BYU, it's not out of the realm of possibilities to see them a potential top 15 team.

UCF plays Penn State in Ireland, travels to Missouri, plays at Houston, before hosting BYU.  They close the season at AAC#3 ECU.  My model has them 8-4, 6-2 in AAC play.  If that offense doesn't come around quickly, that defense will be under a lot of pressure to keep that loss total at 4 or less.

Cincinnati is a bit of a dark horse, in terms of the conference standings.  They are one of the more experienced teams in the league and finished 9-4 last year.  They get Houston and ECU at home, while avoiding UCF.  Games at Ohio State and at Miami make it unlikely to see them hit the 10-win mark unless they pull off wins against both ECU and Houston.  As it is, my model puts them 9-3, with a close win against ECU and a close loss against Houston rounding out a 7-1 conference season.

ECU travels to South Carolina and Virginia Tech, hosting North Carolina, in non-conference play.  1-2 wouldn't be too bad.  They get UCF at home (3-point win) and travel to Cincinnati (3-point loss).  9-3, also 7-1 in AAC.

There is a huge dropoff after ECU in terms of quality of teams in the AAC.  The next 6 in the conference come in two bunches, with Tulane, USF, and UConn.  My model has Tulane and USF at an even 4-4 in conference play, with UConn going 3-5.  The model has all 3 teams just a play or two within making a bowl game.  Hard to belief this was a USF program that was ranked #2 in the country at one point a few years back (granted, that was a serious overevaluation of their abilities at the time, but pollsters have clout in college football and sometimes all they see is W-L record).

The final teams in the AAC are somewhat clumped together as well, with Tulsa, SMU, and Memphis just a few places apart in the rankings, with Temple a distant last.  None of the three made a bowl game last year and my model predicts a similar outcome for this upcoming season.  Temple is the closest pick to go 0-12, but an FCS game on the schedule probably gives them at least one win.  The model does put them within striking distance in 2 games, so I guess one could say the model predicts 1 win, caps them at 3.

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

2014 Pre-Season Insights

I have been feverishly working, day and night, the past two weeks on my pre-season rankings.  I guess it's more of a tool to predict team's records than an actual ranking system.  Because it is a data-driven analysis, I often end up with random Sun Belt or CUSA teams in my "top 25" (teams that my model predicts to win their conferences tend to move up in these rankings, which is why I don't consider them rankings as much as predictive indicators).  Realistically for me, it's more about trying to figure out what teams are going to perform and what ones will be sitting home in late December/early January, who might surprise this season, and how BYU is likely to do.  I am ultimately just trying to quantify my gut.  However, in putting together data for all 128 FBS teams, I see and learn a lot about teams.  So here are a few random observations.

If you ask the average Big Ten or College Football fan who is going to have more success early in their Big Ten tenure, Maryland or Rutgers, 9 out of 10 would probably say Maryland.  After combing through a lot of information about the two teams, I think that's probably a Herbstreit-level analysis.  If you go into any kind of detail at all about the teams, at worst, it's not a clear cut answer, at best, Rutgers is better poised for immediate success.  Some times, it is all about timing and situation.  Both teams appear to have challenging schedules as they transition to new conferences.  Rutgers is coming into it with more experienced (but still young in some cases) QB, offensive line, and defense (which are 3 very important items in the Big 10).  Their more winnable games are at home and the games they were going to lose anyway are on the road, where the reverse is true for Maryland.  The first two years, if I had to guess, Rutgers would be the team to get more wins.  In year one, it may come down to the winner of the regular season finale between the two teams...

I never thought I would say this but I think the SEC may actually be amazingly good from the top all the way to the bottom.  Kentucky and Tennessee should be practically free wins but they still have the ability to surprise, Vanderbilt probably won't be that challenging but is coming off the greatest stretch of football in school history, and Arkansas has massive OL/DL to contend with, even in the absence of quality skill position players.  Everyone else could have a legitimate chance to see the top 25 this season.  There are 6 teams I believe have a shot, if the ball bounces their way, to be in the top 10.  Obviously, it's the SEC, so any team that wins 9 games will receive top 10 love from pollsters, but this year, I think the league is strong enough top-to-bottom, and through the middle, to warrant that love.

The Pac 12 went out and scheduled.  My model puts 7 of the 10 most difficult schedules in the country in the Pac 12 (the other three in the top 10 are Notre Dame, Arkansas, and Tennessee).  9 of the 12 Pac 12 schools play more difficult schedules than the AVERAGE SEC schedule.  Washington plays the easiest schedule with an FCS team, the worst FBS team (according to my model), and add a bad Big Ten team in Illinois, but they also play 13 regular season games b/c they start at Hawaii.

It's going to be a tight squeeze in that 4-team playoff.  The Pac 12 and SEC champs are almost certainly guaranteed.  I'm not as sure about the other 3 conference champions.  From the ACC, Florida State is the only possibility, though their SOS might hold them back b/c their ACC slate is so weak.  From the Big Ten, Ohio State would be almost certain, Michigan State's schedule is worse than Florida State's, and no one else is probably good enough to knock off one of those two.  From the Big XII, any undefeated team theoretically has a chance, but Oklahoma is the only team good enough, with an easy enough schedule, to do it.  It'll be interesting to see how important Strength of Schedule ends up being in determining the playoff contenders.  I think it'll end up being SEC and Pac 12 champs and, by default, 2 other conference champs, assuming the choices are obvious.  It's not entirely out of the realm of possibilities to see one of those conferences snubbed in favor of a 2nd Pac 12 or SEC team.  Looking at schedule strength, which the Committee supposedly will, that is probably what SHOULD happen (but won't).

Final observation tonight: I love college football and can't wait for it to start.  We are just 2 weeks away from the opening kickoff.  Wednesday or Thursday night, I'll try to put out my conference and division champs.